Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Cukierman vs Giles Hussey Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cukierman vs Hussey analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Cukierman vs Giles Hussey Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cukierman 1 - 1 Hussey
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cukierman has won 48.28% of points on their second serve, while Hussey has won 52.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cukierman, in recent form, has won 58.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hussey has won 53.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.36% and 37.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cukierman has saved 47.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hussey has saved 63.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cukierman has won 60.71% of matches played (W/L 34/ 22), with Hussey winning 69.88% (W/L 58/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cukierman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 44/ 28), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Hussey has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 87/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Cukierman has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 24/ 15), where as Hussey has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.06% of matches (W/L 54/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cukierman winning 1 times and Hussey being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Cukierman winning 3 and Hussey winning 3. The last match between Cukierman and Hussey was at the M25 Glasgow, 20-10-2022, Second, I.hard with Giles Hussey getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cukierman and Hussey have played a deciding set 2 times, with Cukierman winning 1 times and Hussey 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cukierman winning 0, and Hussey 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cukierman has played against opponents with an average rank of 243.25 while Hussey has played against players with an average rank of 158.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cukierman has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hussey has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cukierman has converted 45.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hussey has converted 45.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
452
Rank
339
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
353
Rank
353
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
58% (246-179)
Career Total W/L
64% (145-82)
61% (14-9)
YTD W/L
73% (29-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Cukierman | Giles Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 27 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:30 | 2:11:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (104/174) | 63% (101/160) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (61/104) | 64% (65/101) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (37/70) | 44% (26/59) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (9/16) | 56% (9/16) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (69/160) | 44% (76/174) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Giles Hussey
Player
Daniel Cukierman
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| 2-6 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Giles Hussey
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Cukierman | Giles Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (14/9) | 73% (29/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (33/21) | 68% (65/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (268/218) | 56% (500/387) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 76% (29/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 44 | 94 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 90 | 87 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:30 | 1:48:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 256.96 | 149.07 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (921/1472) | 66% (1815/2746) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (627/921) | 66% (1196/1815) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (266/551) | 53% (498/931) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (87/192) | 45% (145/321) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (719/1617) | 44% (1204/2763) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (13/7) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 78% (28/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (14/23) | 74% (28/38) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 82% (9/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 53% (8/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 82% (28/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 18% (28/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 50% (12/6) |
Daniel Cukierman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Daniel Cukierman
65%
(
72 of
110)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
2
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
50 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
6-1 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Richard Zusman
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
10
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Daniel Cukierman
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
49
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Ignacio Carou
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Cukierman
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Wilson Leite
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Giles Hussey Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Giles Hussey
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
63%
(
70 of
111)
1st Serve %
74%
(
94 of
127)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
9
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
56 of
94)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
60 of
127)
125
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(6) 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Giles Hussey
87%
(
67 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Ryuki Matsuda
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Marek Gengel
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Robin Bertrand
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Harry Wendelken
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Enzo Wallart
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Giles Hussey
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(5) 7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Cukierman Vs Hussey Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
